Chronic classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome: a classical variant

Links checked 07/04/19.

Sometimes, Sweet’s syndrome can occur in an unusual form or ‘behave’ in a different way from how we would normally expect. When this happens, this is called a disease variant.

What is chronic classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome?

What is classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome?

Sweet’s syndrome is divided into 3 main groups:

1. Classical Sweet’s syndrome.

Classical Sweet’s syndrome most commonly affects women, particularly those between the ages of 30 to 50 years, but can affect men and people of other ages, including children. Classical Sweet’s syndrome sometimes develops secondary to infection, autoimmune disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and pregnancy. However, in 50% of cases there’s no underlying cause, and this is referred to as idiopathic Sweet’s syndrome.

2. Malignancy-associated Sweet’s syndrome.

In approximately 20% of cases, Sweet’s syndrome develops secondary to some form of cancer. This is referred to as paraneoplastic or malignancy-associated Sweet’s syndrome (MASS). Unlike classical Sweet’s syndrome, it doesn’t affect women more than men, and one of the commonest forms of cancer is a group of blood disorders called myelodysplastic syndromes.

3. Drug-induced Sweet’s syndrome.

In 12% of cases, Sweet’s syndrome is triggered by medication, and this is referred to as drug-induced Sweet’s syndrome. It’s most commonly caused by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), but can be triggered by other medications.

What is chronic Sweet’s syndrome?

In up to 66% of patients with Sweet’s syndrome, their condition settles down after treatment, but in up to 33% it doesn’t. When this happens, it’s often because there’s some kind of underlying cause or trigger for the Sweet’s syndrome. When it persists for a long period of time, even after treatment, this is referred to as chronic Sweet’s syndrome.

What is chronic classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome?

Chronic classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome is a variant of classical Sweet’s syndrome where there’s no underlying cause for the Sweet’s syndrome, but it still persists over a long period of time.

Medical case-study.

This is a case-study discussing two women whose Sweet’s syndrome continued to persist over a long period of time, despite there being no underlying cause for their condition. In both cases, their Sweet’s syndrome was eventually managed, but not resolved, with a sulfa drug called sulfapyridine (Gowda et al, 2016).

Because most cases of persistent or chronic Sweet’s syndrome occur as a result of an underlying disease or medication, the authors of this case-study have proposed that cases of persistent or chronic classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome be seen as a variant of classical Sweet’s syndrome.

Case 1.

A 50-year-old woman was sent to hospital with a 4 month history of skin lesions in the form of ring and arch-shaped red bumps on her back, neck, chest, arms, and thighs. She didn’t have a fever, but did have a swollen face and was experiencing mild itching. Blood tests showed that her white blood cell and neutrophils counts were raised, and two skin biopsies of the lesions showed Sweet’s syndrome. She was started on the steroid medication, prednisone, and her symptoms started to settle. However, once the prednisone was tapered to less than 40mg per day, her condition kept flaring up.

Further tests revealed no underlying cause for the patient’s Sweet’s syndrome, and her condition continued to persist. Symptoms of later flare-ups included fever, ring-shaped red and raised patches, or large blood-filled blisters. Sometimes, the patient also experienced facial swelling, hand swelling, and joint pain. Eventually, the patient decided to stop the prednisone, but the symptoms persisted in a milder form for a period of 8 months. Other treatments that were tried included dapsone, potassium iodide (SSKI), colchicine, and steroid cream. These were stopped because they either didn’t work or because the patient struggled to tolerate the side-effects. After 5 years of follow-up care, there’s still no evidence of underlying disease, and she’s currently being treated with sulfapyridine.

Case 2.

A 73-year-old woman was sent to hospital because of a 9 month history of skin lesions affecting her face, trunk, and extremities. The skin lesions appeared in the form of numerous flat red or brown spots, red raised areas, and blister-like lesions. The patient said that she had not had a fever, but blood tests showed that her white blood cell and neutrophil counts were raised. A skin biopsy also showed Sweet’s syndrome.

There appeared to be no underlying cause for the patient’s Sweet’s syndrome. Medication had been considered as a cause for the patient’s Sweet’s syndrome, but even after her medications had been stopped, her condition didn’t improve. The patient had also been diagnosed with lung cancer and skin cancer, and as cancer is a trigger for Sweet’s syndrome, is something else that could be considered. However, her Sweet’s syndrome didn’t settle even after her cancer had been successfully treated and gone into remission.

The patient had initially been treated with prednisone which worked well. However, once the prednisone was tapered to less than 40mg per day, her condition kept flaring up. During these flare-ups, the skin lesions were painful and ‘burning’, appearing in the form of red patches and red raised areas, large fluid-filled blisters, and fluid or pus-filled spots on reddened and swollen areas of skin. Treatments that were given to try and bring the patient’s Sweet’s syndrome under control included doxycycline, potassium iodide (SSKI), dapsone, colchicine, anakinra, indomethacin, and steroid cream. These were eventually stopped because they either didn’t work or because the patient struggled to tolerate the side-effects. Sulfapyridine was then started alongside prednisone which allowed the prednisone to be tapered to 10mg daily. The patient’s Sweet’s syndrome has continued to be managed with both these medications. She has now been treated for Sweet’s syndrome for more than 4 years, and there’s still no evidence of underlying disease.

References.

Gowda, A., Rosenbach, M., Micheletti, R. and  James, W. (2016) Chronic idiopathic Sweet syndrome: A report of 2 cases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, May; 2(3): 227–229 (PMC).

2012-present, Sweet’s Syndrome UK

One thought on “Chronic classical (idiopathic) Sweet’s syndrome: a classical variant

  1. New Practical Aspects of Sweet Syndrome, Feb. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853033/#CR74

    “In 1986, Su and Liu first proposed diagnostic criteria for classical SS that were then modified by von den Driesch in 1994. The diagnostic criteria proposed by von den Driesch require the fulfillment of both major criteria and two of the four minor criteria listed in 1. Of note, we point out that the von den Driesch criteria require neutrophilic infiltrate to diagnose SS; however, several reports have diagnosed SS despite the lack of a predominant neutrophilic infiltrate. We recommend against the use of SS as an umbrella term to describe entities that present histologically with eosinophilic or lymphocytic infiltrate, despite presenting clinically as SS.”

    Like

Leave a comment